https://doi.org/10.4081/peasa.39
Anti-Newtonianism in the 18th century: the case of Scotland
Submitted: July 28, 2024
Accepted: November 15, 2024
Published: December 20, 2024
Accepted: November 15, 2024
Abstract Views: 40
PDF: 7
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This study examines anti-Newtonianism within the context of Scotland in the 18th century. discussing its unique intellectual and cultural nuances. Admittedly Newtonianism and anti-Newtonianism were global phenomena, however this article concentrates on the Scottish context to uncover specific intellectual and cultural dynamics. By focusing on the reactions to Newton’s ideas within Scotland, the article aims to reveal the diverse ways Scottish intellectuals engaged with and challenged Newtonian principles.
Arbuthnot J (1733). An essay concerning the effects of air on human bodies. London, J. Tonson.
Beattie LM (1935). John Arbuthnot: Mathematician and satirist. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734890
Burnett J (1799). Antient metaphysics or the science of universals with an appendix containing an examination of the principles of Sir Isaac Newton’s philosophy. London, T. Cadell.
Cantor GN (1983). Optics after Newton, Theories of Light in Britain and Ireland, 1704-1840. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Catcott A (1761). A treatise on Deluge. London, Alexander Catcott.
Forbes D (1732). A letter to a bishop concerning some important discoveries in philosophy and theology. London, Duncan Forbes.
Forbes D (1735). Some thoughts concerning religion, natural and revealed, and manner of understanding revelation: tending to show that Christianity is indeed very near, as old as the creation. London, Woodfall.
Forbes D (1750). Reflections on the sources of incredulity with regard to religion. Edinburgh, G. Hamilton and J. Balfour.
Forbes D (1755). The whole works of the Right Honourable Duncan Forbes. Edinburgh, G. Hamilton and J. Balfour.
Frei H (1974). The eclipse of biblical narrative, a study in the eighteenth and nineteenth century hermeneutis. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Friesen J (2003). Archibald Pitcairne, David Gregory and the Scottish origins of English Tory Newtonianism, 1688-1715. Hist Sci 41:163-91.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/007327530304100203
Guerrini A (1986). The Tory Newtonians: Gregory, Pitcairne and their Circle. J Brit Stud 25:288-311.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/385866
Home H (1771). Of the laws of motion. In: Royal Society of Edinburgh (ed.), Essays and Observations, Physical and Literary. Article I. Edinburgh, G. Hamilton and J. Balfour.
Jacob JR, Jacob MC. (1980). The Anglican Origins of Modern Science. Isis 71:251-267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/352463
Jacob MC (1981). The radical enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans. London, George Allen & Unwin.
Levine JM (1977). Woodward’s shield: history, science, and satire in Augustan England. Berkeley, University of California Press.
McConnell A (2004). Martine, George (1700-1741). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, vol. 37. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/18227
Mandelbrote S (2002). Newton and the eighteenth-century Christianity. In: R. Iliffe and G.E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. pp. 554-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139058568.016
Mandelbrote S (2004). Eighteenth-century reactions to Newton’s Anti-Trinitarianism. In: J.E. Force and S. Hutton (eds.), Newton and Newtonianism. International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives internationales d’histoire des idées. Dordrecht,S pringer. pp 93-111.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2238-7_6
Manuel FE (1963). Isaac Newton, Historian. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Martine G (1740). An examination of the Newtonian argument for the emptiness of space, and of the resistance of subtle fluids. London, T. Cooper.
Olson R (1983). Tory-High Church opposition to science and scientism in the eighteenth century: the works of John Arbuthnot, Jonathan Swift, and Samuel Johnson. In: J. Burke (ed.) (1983) The uses of science in the age of Newton. Berkeley, University of California Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520318649-010
Ross IS (1972). Lord Kames and the Scotland of his day. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
Shoesmith E (1987). The continental controversy over Arbuthnot’s argument for divine providence. Hist Math 14:133-46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0315-0860(87)90017-6
Shuttleton DE (1985). A modest examination: John Arbuthnot and the Scottish Newtonians. J Eighteenth-Century 18:47-63.
Snobelen SD (2004). To discourse of God: Isaac Newton’s heterodox theology and his natural philosophy. In: P. Wood (ed.), Science and Dissent in England, 1688-1945. Abingdon, Routledge. pp. 39-65
Stewart L (2004). The trouble with Newton in the eighteenth century. In: J.E. Force and S. Hutton (eds.), Newton and Newtonianism. International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives internationales d’histoire des idées. Dordrecht, Springer. pp. 221-238.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2238-7_11
Tarbuck GD (2021). Sociability and Newtonianism in Scotland. Academia Letters.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20935/AL802
Warrand D (1923-1930). More Culloden papers. Inverness, R. Carruthers.
Wilson A (1748). The Principles of Philosophy. London, M. Cooper.
Wilson A (1754). The principles of natural philosophy: with some remarks up an the fundamental principles of the Newtonian philosophy. London, W. Russel.
Wilson A (1764). Short observations on the principles and moving powers assumed by the present system of philosophy. London, W. Nicoll.
Woodward J (1695). An essay towards the natural history of the Earth. London.
Woodward J (1729). An attempt toward a natural history of fossils. London.
Young DA (1987). Scripture in the hands of geologists (part one). W T J 49:1-34.
Young DA (1995). The biblical Flood, a case study of the Church’s response to extrabiblical evidence. Grand Rapids, Eerdmans.
How to Cite
Gürses Tarbuck, D. (2024). Anti-Newtonianism in the 18th century: the case of Scotland. Proceedings of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts, 3. https://doi.org/10.4081/peasa.39
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s)
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
